PDF Ebook Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie
From the mix of knowledge and actions, a person can boost their skill as well as capacity. It will lead them to live and work better. This is why, the pupils, employees, and even companies ought to have reading routine for publications. Any book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie will certainly provide certain expertise to take all benefits. This is what this Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie tells you. It will certainly add more expertise of you to life and work much better. Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie, Try it and also verify it.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie
PDF Ebook Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie
Book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie is one of the priceless well worth that will certainly make you constantly abundant. It will not imply as rich as the money provide you. When some people have absence to face the life, people with numerous books often will certainly be better in doing the life. Why need to be publication Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie It is really not meant that book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie will certainly offer you power to reach every little thing. The e-book is to read as well as what we implied is the publication that is reviewed. You can likewise see how guide qualifies Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie as well as varieties of publication collections are offering here.
For everybody, if you want to start accompanying others to review a book, this Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie is much recommended. As well as you have to get guide Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie right here, in the link download that we provide. Why should be here? If you really want other kind of publications, you will certainly consistently find them as well as Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie Economics, national politics, social, sciences, religions, Fictions, and a lot more publications are supplied. These available publications are in the soft files.
Why should soft file? As this Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie, lots of people additionally will should get the book sooner. But, often it's so far way to obtain guide Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie, also in other country or city. So, to reduce you in discovering guides Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie that will support you, we help you by giving the lists. It's not just the list. We will give the suggested book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie link that can be downloaded and install directly. So, it will certainly not require even more times as well as days to present it and various other publications.
Collect the book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie begin with now. But the brand-new method is by collecting the soft data of guide Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie Taking the soft data can be conserved or kept in computer or in your laptop. So, it can be more than a book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie that you have. The simplest method to expose is that you could additionally save the soft documents of Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie in your ideal and also available device. This problem will certainly intend you too often check out Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie in the downtimes more than talking or gossiping. It will certainly not make you have bad habit, but it will certainly lead you to have far better routine to read book Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong, By J. L. Mackie.
This title presents an insight into moral skepticism of the 20th century. The author argues that our every-day moral codes are an 'error theory' based on the presumption of moral facts which, he persuasively argues, don't exist. His refutation of such facts is based on their metaphysical 'queerness' and the observation of cultural relativity.
- Sales Rank: #446077 in Books
- Published on: 1991-05-17
- Released on: 1991-05-17
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 7.74" h x .62" w x 5.12" l, 1.10 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 256 pages
About the Author
John Leslie Mackie (1917-1981) was a philosopher who made significant contributions to the fields of ethics, metaphysics, and the philosophy of religion. A professor of philosophy at the universities of Sydney, Otago, New Zealand, and York, he was elected a fellow of the University of Oxford in 1967 and to the British Academy in 1974.
Most helpful customer reviews
58 of 59 people found the following review helpful.
A Classic of Contemporary Moral Philosophy
By ctdreyer
The first chapter of Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong is the locus classicus for error theories in contemporary meta-ethics. There he argues that ordinary moral discourse and thought involve an assumption that there are what he calls "objective values," and that this assumption is false. Consequently, ordinary moral thought and language are infected by an error that precludes any ordinary moral claims and thoughts from being true.
Mackie first argues for a cognitivist interpretation of moral language. In other words, he argues that ordinary moral claims purport to describe facts about the world. In particular, ordinary moral language and thought purport to describe facts about objective moral values. What are objective moral values? They have two defining characteristics: (i) mind-independent existence (think of how chairs, trees, people, and electrons exist), and (ii) "intrinsic and categorical prescriptivity": that is, they are such that the mere apprehension of them will motivate a person to act in a certain way. The former characteristic is the source of their objectivity; the latter is the source of their normativity.
But, he claims, we have good reason to think that no such things exist. Mackie's fundamental worry about these putative objective values is that these things are especially "queer," that they are unlike any other things we have good reason to think exist. As I understand Mackie, underlying his worries about the queerness of these putative entities is his perception of a tension in their nature. He appears to believe that the objectivity of these putative entities is in tension with their intrinsic and categorical action-guidingness. That is, it is unclear to Mackie how something that exists as a mind-independent part of reality could have the sort of influence on human behavior that these objective values are supposed to have. It is unclear how something could be both objective and normative. The things that scientists study and that we encounter in the everyday world simply don't have this sort of categorical action-guidingness built into them. So, given the naturalistic conception of the world that Mackie favors, we have good a posteriori reasons to doubt the existence of objective moral values.
But, if Mackie is correct about the nature of ordinary moral thought and language, this commits us to regarding ordinary moral thought and language as involving a very fundamental sort of error, an error of presupposing that objective moral values exist. Mackie then completes his error theory by providing an explanation of our tendency to make this error, to mistakenly suppose that ordinary moral thought and language involve our successfully coming to know about the sorts of things he claims don't exist.
Mackie's book doesn't end here, however. Indeed, this is only the first chapter, and Mackie goes on to cover a wide range of territory in normative ethics and meta-ethics, along with a few issues in metaphysics (the existence of God and freedom of the will) that have some bearing on moral issues. In fact, despite his worries about the objectivity of morality, Mackie goes on to defend a substitute for morality, one that looks quite a bit like a broadly consequentialist moral theory, and he even weighs in on several controversial moral issues that are still with us. In short, in a little over two hundred pages of exceptionally clear prose, Mackie covers just about everything of interest in moral philosophy.
This book is, of course, essential reading for anyone interested in meta-ethics. Understanding some of the material and its importance may require some background knowledge, but enough of the book is more generally accessible that it also constitutes a good wide-ranging introduction to issues in both meta-ethics and normative ethics for a person with some background in philosophy (and perhaps for the general reader). Furthermore, the book, while not a work of history, is sufficiently informed about the history of the issues it discusses to provide the reader with an entry into study of the history of the subject.
If you're especially interested in Mackie's meta-ethical views, you should attempt to track down a copy of Morality and Objectivity (Ted Honderich, ed.), as it includes interesting and important reactions to Mackie's views by some major names (John McDowell, Simon Blackburn, R. M. Hare, Bernard Williams, et al.) in moral philosophy.
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
A Classic of 20th Century Ethics Indeed...
By IR
It might be read as an introduction to Ethics, but it isn't one. It is rather one of the most important works in 20th century ethics.
Mackie's book was revolutionary since being the first one to combine anti-realism (no objectively prescriptive values in the world) with cognitivism (the meaning of ethical statements can be true or false). Most of the previous anti-realists were anti-realists mostly implicitly, only because of being non-cognitivsts. Mackie has a different view which in my opinion is much more closer to the truth. The book also contains his error theory (people have a disposition to see their value judgments as objective). While the reviewer cdtreyer as the mainstream tradition have concentrated on Mackie's error theory I think it is much less important than the denial of the objective values and the justification of the role of morality in quasi-contractual terms.
Mackie's views on positive morality are justified by quasi-contractual (he discusses Plato's Protagoras, Hobbes and Hume) means and would combine very well with evolutionary perspectives. The discussion on the content of normative views is just a brief sketch, but this isn't really what this book is about anyway. Anyone who claims that the contents of the first part of the book undermine the contents of the second should read chapter 5 again and again and again. That there are no objective values in the world does not mean that there can't be right or wrong - it simply must be (or rather already has largely been) invented and constructed.
If you are interested in ethics you simply need to read this small, but important book which, while not being an introduction is still quite simple and very elegantly written. Besides the main content you will also get to read a great discussion on the meaning of the good (in debate with the classical Geach-Hare discussion found in Philippa Foot's "Theories of Ethics"), discussion on the is-ought problem and its flawed Searlean solution (also found in Foots collection), a chapter on univerzalisability of moral judgments (contra Hare) and on the frontiers of ethics: voluntary actions, determinism, law, politics, religion.
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful.
Father of Error Theory
By Jaime Andrews
This book is the father of all error theory books. He originates some of the central critiques of moral thought and discourse that guys like Richard Garner rely on (see also: Beyond Morality). They think there is something bizarre about morality's commitment to categorical reasons (things that you ought or ought not to do regardless of what your desires happen to be). They think moral properties are queer because he says that don't fit into a naturalistic worldview and because they are thought to supervene on non-moral properties (i.e. the moral properties "fix" the moral facts... so the non-moral fact of kicking a puppy is always accompanied by the property of wrongness).
As you may notice, the theory presented in this book does not agree with me. Error theory argues that morality is systemically erroneous... what do we do with moral thought and discourse then? If Mackie thinks supervenient relationships are flawed, exactly how do ordinary natural facts determine the moral facts? He argues for conservationism (rather than eliminativism) because he recognizes the instrinsic vlue of morality, although I don't see that working. I agree more with the ideas of David Boonin, David Enoch, and Michael Huemer.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie PDF
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie EPub
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie Doc
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie iBooks
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie rtf
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie Mobipocket
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, by J. L. Mackie Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar